| The Best American Science Writing 2006 |  | Author: Atul Gawande
Publisher: Harper Perennial
Category: Book
List Price: $14.95
Buy Used: $0.01
as of 9/5/2010 15:34 CDT details
You Save: $14.94 (100%)
New (24) Used (80) from $0.01
Seller: chocolate4always
Rating:  13 reviews
Sales Rank: 126,927
Media: Paperback
Edition: 2006
Pages: 384
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.7
Dimensions (in): 7.9 x 5.3 x 1
ISBN: 006072644X
Dewey Decimal Number: 808
EAN: 9780060726447
ASIN: 006072644X
Publication Date: September 1, 2006
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Together these twenty-one articles on a wide range of today's most leading topics in science, from Dennis Overbye, Jonathan Weiner, and Richard Preston, among others, represent the full spectrum of scientific inquiry, proving once again that "good science writing is evidently plentiful" (American Scientist).
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 13
 One of the best of its kind October 29, 2006
Dennis Littrell (SoCal)
14 out of 14 found this review helpful
All the "Best American..." books are good because they are collections of the best writing, usually magazine writing, done in the year indicated. The series titles include Best American Science Writing, Best American Science and Nature Writing, Best American Essays, Best American Sports Writing, Best American Short Stories, even Best American Sex Writing. The essay choices are up to the person--always an illustrious figure, an expert--who edits each volume. For the year 2006 we have Dr. Atul Gawande, a famous surgeon and author of Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science (2002). Previous editors of the "Best...Science..." series have been James Gleick (2000), Timothy Ferris (2001), Matt Ridley (2002), Oliver Sacks (2003), Dava Sobel (2004), and Alan Lightman (2005).
I have read all or part of the entire series beginning in 2000, and while every collection has been interesting, even fascinating, this year's collection is particularly good. I say this because Gawande, in keeping close to his area of expertise, has chosen articles mainly in the fields of biology, medicine, computers and information theory, and evolution, and these happen to be fields that especially interest me. The emphasis in this volume then is on the so-called "soft" sciences rather than the "hard" ones, although not exclusively so. Moreover, Gawande has managed to find essays that are especially well-written. I was a bit dazzled at the wordsmithing ability of some of the writers to say nothing about the fascinating and informative content of their essays. In particular I want to point to Alan Weisman's "Earth Without People"; D. T. Max's "The Literary Darwinists"; Karen Wright's "The Day Everything Died"; Jack Hitt's "Mighty White of You"; and Paul Bloom's "Is God an Accident" as very impressive.
One of the reasons the essays are so good is that they first appeared in some of our best journals, including Harper's, The Atlantic Monthly, Discover, The New Yorker, et al. where they were scrupulously edited by some of the best editors working today. A good editor is a godsend for a writer, and a great editor can make the difference between a piece that is ordinary and one that is outstanding. Anyone wanting to improve their writing might read these essays for that reason alone.
Now just a few quick thoughts about some of the essays:
Alan Weisman achieves an eerie, sci fi mood in his "Earth without People" as he imagines how the planet might change if people suddenly disappeared. His insights come partly from recalling what the planet was like before humans came upon the scene, especially North America with its teeming mass of extinct large mammals.
Gardiner Harris and Anahad O'Connor point to the disconnect between scientific knowledge and the public's perception of what is likely true and what likely isn't in "On Autism's Cause, It's Parents vs. Research." It appears that there is almost no way that mercury in vaccines causes autism, yet there remains a hard core of parents of autistic children who believe otherwise. What I think this shows is that our personal experience--a sampling of one--is so persuasive that often we cannot put it aside regardless of the evidence.
H. Allen Orr demonstrates in his carefully composed essay "Devolution" that faith-based "intelligent design" might well be a sign of human devolution.
D. T. Max's "The Literary Darwinists" introduced me to a new slant on literary criticism, clearly a natural progression in postmodern thought: namely to subject literary works to examinations from Darwinian principles. Particularly delicious is evolutionary psychology as applied to Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice, which begins with this irresistible first line, "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife."
What struck me as most instructive in Karen Wright's "The Day Everything Died," which is about the Permian extinction and the controversy surrounding it, is just how much more difficult it is to study something that happened a quarter of a billion years ago than it is to study something (the K-T extinction) that happened a mere 65 million years ago.
I absolutely loved Jack Hitt's, witty, satirical take on being Charlemagne's direct descendant (he is and so are you!), as he muses on Kennewick man and some not so subtle racism among those touting pre-Clovis humans in the Americas.
But my favorite piece in the book is Paul Bloom's "Is God an Accident." Having recently read Sam Harris' The End of Faith (2005) and other works, I somehow felt in total understanding about why humans believe impossible (or at least very unlikely) things. Clearly religion exists in all societies because it is adaptive and contributes to tribal cohesion which helps the tribe defeat other tribes in warfare, etc. However Bloom's essay broadened my understanding. His argument is that religion is essentially a kind of hardwired dualism in our brains that came about because we have two simultaneous ways of perceiving the world, one physical and the other social. Our social perceptions result in a belief system based on minds, that is what others may think and what may be possible in manipulating the content of minds vis-a-vis real world objects, e.g., coming up with unicorns and holy fathers with bad tempers. Consequently it feels right for us to believe in things unseen, unheard, undemonstrated.
I also liked the last essay in the book, Frans B. M. de Waal's short piece on why "We're All Machiavellians," a "truth" he learned from watching chimpanzees. His asks why don't we just admit to our lust to power? It is so obvious. Instead we and especially our politicians pretend we are "public servants" and it is other people who want power.
In short, this is the most readable collection of science essays that I have read in recent years.
Buffet For the Science Gourmet October 17, 2006
The Spinozanator (Waco, Texas)
8 out of 8 found this review helpful
This collection of exceptional articles comes out annually in the fall, as does its competitor, "Best Science and Nature Writing, 2006." I eagerly anticipate the publication of them both. Guest editor Atul Gawande made the final selection of 21 essays from 10 different periodicals and one book. "The New Yorker" had the most selections with six. Three essays were picked for both books.
H. Allen Orr - An unusually non-polemic critique of intelligent design. Orr's analyzes the arguments of ID's two main advocates - Behe and Dempsky. Both of them have grudgingly admitted that once the cell was in existence, evolution by random mutation and natural selection could have done the rest.
Richard Preston - The author joins Steve Sillett (botany professor and advanced tree climber) in exploring redwood canopies 300-375 feet above ground. To accomplish entry, they shoot an arrow from a powerful hunting bow over a low branch, perhaps 200 feet up. A fishing line is tied to the arrow, and is used to pull the 600 foot climbing rope back over that branch. That's the easy part.
Frans B. M. de Waal - The author always enjoyed being tuned to his environment, watching people in action - especially their body language. During thousands of hours as a graduate student in the 70's, de Waal watched chimps, and found that Machiavelli was a better guide than his texts. Chimpanzee politics was like human politics - a matter of individual strategies clashing to see who came out ahead - of course the chimps were much more transparent. The author began to see people around him in a different light.
Tom Mueller - Computers have triumphed at chess not by aping human thought, as most artificial intelligence experts had expected, but by playing like machines. Now they are playing subtler, more imaginative chess than the humans they've been designed to emulate. Programmers say, "This is an emergent phenomenon, not something I put into it." A growing number of cognitive scientists and philosophers see no fundamental distinction between computers and human brains.
Michael Chorost - This article is one of my favorites and is one of three that appeared in both books. The author was born almost deaf and didn't learn to talk until he got hearing aids at age three and a half. At age 15 he somehow got hooked on the "Bolero," a famous orchestral piece known for its dynamic crescendos. From that time on, he judged each new hearing aid by listening to his favorite rendition of "Bolero." Then for unexplained reasons he became completely deaf at age 38. The story of how a cochlear implant brought back his hearing ranges through engineering, computer science, physics, ear physiology, and the continued use of "Bolero."
Gardiner Harris and Anahad O'Conner - Analysis of the conspiracy theory that says the mercury preservative that used to be in vaccines has caused autism. Despite the opposition of overwhelming scientific consensus, Dr. Mark Geier and his son, David, lead the very successful movement. Mark has served as a witness in as many as ninety trials. Scientists say the Geiers' research is tainted by faulty methodology. Geier (and others) say Public Health officials are "just trying to cover it up."
Charles Mann - This great article also appeared in both books. Pills that increase longevity may be just around the corner, but the consequences may not all be good. The author discusses the intergenerational personal and political warfare that will most certain come to the table - should the elderly refuse to die.
D. T. Max - Horizons of Darwin's theory have broadened recently - from biology to psychology, and now to interpretation of great literature. For one example, from the very first page, "Pride and Prejudice" is chock full of life's-passage moments that resonate with meaning in the field of Evolutionary Psychology. E. O. Wilson might be the father of this movement and is thrilled to think that science and the humanities have united.
The rest of the essays are just as fascinating as the ones I've mentioned above. Readers will most likely come away with a deep appreciation of the work done by scientists and the journalists who write about them - and with a deeper appreciation of science itself.
Best American Rules December 8, 2006
Nicole (Pittsburgh, PA)
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
I get Best American books every year at this time, and I really look forward to them. My favorite is Non-Required Reading, but I would have to say Science Writing is usually a close second. In past volumes I had to skip over certain articles, specifically those within the field of physics. This was the first time I read them all. In fact, I even re-read one that I first saw earlier this year in The New Yorker. I thought that a good way to show my appreciation for this collection would be to share some of the best quotations:
"H.L. Mencken once said that for every complex problem there is a simple solution - and it's wrong." This comes from Gibbs' "Obesity." It isn't actually Gibbs' idea, but it's well-placed and I have used it many times in the past few weeks.
"The rational public-health approach would be to vaccinate those who would first be exposed [to avian flu] - heal-care workers and people in the region where an epidemic has struck. That is unlikely to happen." This is from Specter's "Nature's Bioterrorist," and it illustrates how power-hungry egotists will cause most of the human race to die needlessly in the future. (Possibly.)
"The genotype may be identical in a clone, but it gets expressed differently." This is from Quammen's "Clone Your Troubles Away." I like it because I think it's hilarious to think of people spending millions on a spare pet or child and getting an entirely unexpected being.
Mann's "The Coming Death Shortage" inspired me to write science-fiction stories. It interests me to think of a world in which "the 'becalmed temperament' of old people" is at war with "the legions of youth - 'the protagonists...of protest, instability, reform, and revolution.'"
Orr, in "Devolution," gives a wonderful analogy for accidental natural selection: "When you're looking at a bustling urban street...you probably can't tell which shop went into business first. This is partly because many businesses now depend on one another and partly because new shops trigger changes in old ones..."
"Because we no longer read mythological stories, we no longer appreciate their immense power. We find ourselves stunned at how something so many deeply long to be true will simply assemble itself into fact right before our eyes." Hitt, in "Mighty White of You," has pretty much discredited much of anthropology. Correct me if you get a different intepretation here.
"...the real problem with natural selection is that it makes no intuitive sense. It is like quantum physics; we may intellectually grasp it, but it will never feel right to us." This is from Bloom's "Is God an Accident?" It makes the case that we simply cannot conceive (many of us) that things are not created by someone.
"Among all members of our species, the chain reaction of contagious yawning synchronizes the behavioral as well as the physiological state of our tribe. Yawning is a reminder that ancient and unconsious behavior lurks beneath the veneer of our culture, rationality and language, continuing to influence our lives." This is in Provine's "Yawning," one of my favorite pieces, and I love that his message is one of natural equality.
I highly recommend this year's Best American Science Writing. It is a fascinating and enjoyable read.
Extraordinary collection of articles about science... made understandable! January 4, 2007
Robert Schmidt (Honolulu, HI USA)
The Best American Science Writing shares a quality with books of a similar name but dated in 2004 and 2005. They are all very interesting! Richard Feynman wrote QED, in part, because he wanted to write a series of lectures that would make quantum electrodynamics understandable to his friend, Alix Mautner. I think Mautner would appreciate these books as well.
In this collection, my favorites include "Earth Without People," "The Curse of Akkad," "Obesity: An Overblown Epidemic?," "Nature's Bioterrorist," "What Makes People Gay?," "Clone Your Troubles Away," "The Coming Death Shortage," "Devolution," "Mighty White of You," and "Is God an Accident?" "The Tangle" was a particularly interesting, and tricky, overview of the scientific process.
Articles average about 20 pages, so it is relatively easy to pick this book up and enjoy an article, coming back to the others at another time. I've loaned my copy to others just so they could read one article.
I await the next book in this series!
Easy-to-Read, Interesting Science Writing January 13, 2007
TJ Burr (High Country)
You don't even have to be an avid science reader to enjoy the 21 well-written science stories contained in this book. I enjoy reading scientific articles in science publications, but admit that they can be dry at times. Science and technical writing can also be choppy, full of jargon, and difficult to read. This is not the case with this book. The writing flows smoothly making the reading simple and enjoyable. The other aspect that I like about The Best American Science Writing 2006 is that I learn new information about our environment. Topics covered in the book are current and relevant to our lives.
The article, Climbing in the Redwoods by Richard Preston, introduces the reader to a sub-environment within our environment that only a handful of people could ever experience themselves. In The Coming Death Shortage, Charles Mann discusses the potential results of our ever-increasing lifespans. At the retail price of $14.95, this book is a bargain. You would pay much more if you were buying these articles individually in magazines.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 13
|
|
|
Copyright © 2009 Essays & Commentary
| |
